The Political Freakshow

Here’s a takedown of Bill’s comments, one-by-one, about Anders Behring Breivik, Muslims, and liberals.

1) Bill calls out the New York Times for allegedly creating a false comparison of Breivik to Muslims (Breivik was a CHRISTIAN EXTREMIST)

Bill, Breivik had a 1500-page CHRISTIAN manifesto, detailing the history of Christianity and the history of Muslims and Islam. He also had a video he released to his Facebook friends about the same thing. 

2) “A number of other news organizations played up the Christian angle.”

Bill, wrong again. Your own organization jumped the gun, blaming Muslims where there were none involved. Then, instead of apologizing and correcting your error, you continued to lie about your error and claim that the liberal media caused you to mess up and were the real ones that messed anything up.

Here’s more about how Fox played up the Muslim and Islam angle:

Right-Wing Media Figures Instantly Pinned Blame For Norway Attacks On Muslims

Right-Wing Media Immediately Blamed Muslims For Norway Attacks. With no evidence, the conservative media blamed the attacks on radical Islam. Those who participated in the rush to judgment included Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post, CNN contributor Erick Erickson, and Andrew Breitbart’s BigPeace.com. The Breitbart website surmised that the attacks could have meant that Norway’s “big Muslim problem” had “just blown up in its face.” Erickson wrote via Twitter: “Terrorist bombing in Oslo. I bet you it was not Lutherans who did it.” Pamela Geller posted a headline on her blog asking if there was “Jihad in Norway.” [Media Matters 7/24/11, Atlas Shrugs, 7/22/11]

But Mainstream Media Also Rushed To Suggest That Norway Terrorist Was Muslim

CNN’s Cruickshank Reported That “Norway Has Been In Al Qaeda’s Crosshairs,” Ignoring Other Explanations For Attack. From the July 22 edition of CNN Newsroom:

BALDWIN: Our terrorism analyst Paul Cruickshank is standing. He joins me from London. And, Paul, I just want to hit you right up with this. Why Norway? Why would terrorists target the Scandinavian country?

PAUL CRUICKSHANK, CNN TERRORISM ANALYST: Well, actually, Norway has been in al Qaeda’s crosshairs for quite some time.

In 2003, Ayman al-Zawahiri, the now leader of al Qaeda, issued a threat against Norway, singled Norway out. Norway is in Afghanistan, it’s part of NATO. But also last year a newspaper in Norway published controversial images of the Prophet Mohammed, republished those images which had been originally published in a Danish newspaper some years back. So many reasons why a group like al Qaeda or another jihadist group may want to come after a country like Norway, Brooke.

[…]

CRUICKSHANK: I think we’re talking about a relatively high level of sophistication here. The carnage recalls the scenes in 1998 of the U.S. African embassies that were targeted by al Qaeda. This was a huge bomb that was exploded today. It seems to have killed, unfortunately, a significant amount of people. 

Also, coordinated attacks it seems today where they may have been trying to take out some of the political leadership of Norway as well. So it bears all the hallmarks of the al Qaeda terrorist organization at the moment. But we don’t know at this point who was responsible, Brooke.

BALDWIN: You know, after Osama bin Laden’s death, there were Islamic extremists who came forward and said there will be retaliation, there will be revenge, we will be coming back. Might this be a manifestation of that threat?

CRUICKSHANK: It’s possibly that this is in some way related to that. And in Norway, in recent months, there’s been increased terrorist threat activity chatter that Norwegian counterterrorism services have been monitoring. [CNN, CNN Newsroom, 7/22/11]

CNN’s Elbagir: “Many Of Those On The Extremist Fringes” Believe Attack Was Revenge For Bin Laden’s Death. From the July 22 edition of CNN Newsroom:

KAYE: And any claims yet of responsibility in terms of the bombing?

ELBAGIR: We haven’t had any serious claims, but what we are seeing on a lot of the pro-jihad forums is a lot of celebration, a lot of jubilation. They said that the mujahedeen, the Islamic extremists promised revenge after Osama bin Laden’s death and many of those on the extremist fringes of the Islamic movement believe that this now that revenge. In fact, one just posted that Europe, there is more coming. Many in the intelligence community that I’ve been speaking to say that their concern is that if it is an Islamic extremist group that has carried out the attack — that this was done because they believe that Norway was a soft target. You’ve had several al Qaeda franchises, like al Qaeda in Yemen attempting to hit out Europe and the United States. And they believe that they might have tried to hit Norway because they did not think that their security was really as strong as it could have been. [CNN, CNN Newsroom, 7/22/11]

Washington Post Repeated “Speculation” That “Kurdish Militant Group” Was Responsible For Attack. From a July 22 blog post on WashingtonPost.com:

In the immediate aftermath of the attack in Oslo, speculation about the party that might be responsible has centered on Ansar al-Islam, a Kurdish militant group that has been tied by U.S. officials to al-Qaeda and that carried out attacks on American troops and civilians in Iraq at the height of the war there.

Norway’s contingent in Afghanistan, or even its “cartoon crisis” of 2006, could make the country a target for any number of terrorist groups, asthe Atlantic has noted.

[…]

Still, Ansar — a Sunni group that has been formally designated a terrorist organization by the United States — could make good sense if for no other reason than the timing of the attack.

As J.M. Berger notes over at Foreign Policy, the group’s founder, known as Mullah Krekar, was arrested just last week for allegedly threatening Norwegian politicians with death if he were deported from the country. [WashingtonPost.com, 7/22/11]

Reuters Responded To Attacks With List Of “Islamist Militant Attacks In Europe.” Shortly after the attacks, Reuters posted “Factbox” on its website listing “Islamist militant attacks in Europe.” [Reuters.com, 7/22/11]

Reuters Also Put Out List Of “Some Of The Islamist Militant Groups With A Record Of Links To Plots In Europe.” Reuters reported that “NATO member Norway has been the target of threats.” It later reported on “some of the Islamist militant groups with a record of links to plots in Europe,” and listed Al Qaeda, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Lashkar-E-Taiba/Jaish-E-Mohammed, Al Shabaab, Tehrik-E-Taliban Pakistan, and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. [Reuters, 7/22/11, via Montreal Gazette]

• National Journal Said Reuters List Showed The “Likely Suspects Of The Attack[[s]].” In its July 22 liveblog of media reports on the attack, National Journal wrote: “Reuters has a new report on the likely suspects of the attack.” [National Journal, 7/22/11]

New York Times Quoted Expert Who Translated Claims Of Islamic Terrorism, But Disregarded His Caveats. The U.K. newspaper The Independent reported:

There were initial claims of responsibility for the attacks from Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami (the Helpers of the Global Jihad), according to Will McCants a terrorism analyst cited by The New York Times. But it could not be confirmed.

Whoever was behind the attacks, Islamic fundamentalist internet forums were yesterday reported to have described the Oslo blast as “cheering news”. One user was quoted as saying: “Get your troops out of Afghanistan or you will see blood on the streets.” Since the publication of cartoons of the prophet Mohammed in a Danish newspaper five years ago, al-Qa’ida has declared its intention to carry out an act of revenge on a Scandinavian country. [Independent.co.uk, 7/23/11]

• Times Did Not Quote McCants’ Admission That Helpers Of The Global Jihad “Could Just Be The One Guy Running His Mouth.” From McCants’ Twitter feed:

[Twitter, 7/22/11]

• NY Times Report Was Picked Up By Right-Wing Media To Blame Attack On Muslims. Right-wing media outlets such as Geller’s Atlas Shrugs, Glenn Beck’s The Blaze, and National Review Online all uncritically circulated the Times report on The Helpers’ claim of responsibility. [Atlas Shrugs, 7/22/11, The Blaze, 7/22/11, National Review Online, 7/22/11]

• NY Times Article On Attacks Scrubbed Of Reference To McCants. From the latest version ofThe New York Times article:

Initial reports focused on the possibility of Islamic militants, in particular Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or Helpers of the Global Jihad, cited by some analysts as claiming responsibility for the attacks. American officials said the group was previously unknown and might not even exist.

There was ample reason for concern that terrorists might be responsible. In 2004 and again in 2008, the No. 2 leader of Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, who took over after the death of Osama bin Laden, threatened Norway because of its support of the American-led NATO military operation in Afghanistan. [The New York Times, 7/22/11]

CNN Reported That “Chatter” Provided Clues Regarding The Motive For An Al Qaeda Attack On Norway. From CNN.com:

CNN terrorism analyst Paul Cruickshank said it was far too early to draw any conclusions on whether it was terrorism and who would carry it out. But, he said, by looking at the extent of the damage, it was plain to see the hallmarks of a major attack.

Cruickshank said that in recent months, there had been increased “chatter” about Norway, which had been investigating militants suspected of being linked to al Qaeda.

Norway also drew the ire of al Qaeda for publishing the controversial political cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that appeared in a Danish newspaper and sparked outrage in the militant Islamic community.

The Scandinavian country also plays a part in NATO’s operation in Afghanistan, and now, in Libya. [CNN.com, 7/22/11]

USA Today Reported On Potential Motives For Islamic Extremists. From USAToday.com:

Update at 10:14 a.m. ET: Although the source of the blast is unclear, Al-Jazeera TV notes that Norwegian prosecutors on Tuesday filed a terrorism charge against Mullah Krekar, founder of the Kurdish Islamist group Ansar al-Islam. Mullah Krekar is accused of threatening a former minister, Erna Solberg, with death, Al-Jazeera says. [USAToday.com, 7/22/11]

Fox “Straight News” Program Hosted John Bolton, Who Said, “It Sure Looks Like Islamic Terrorism.” From the July 22 edition of Fox News’ America Live:

BOLTON: Well, this is a very un-Norwegian act, so the odds of it coming from someone other than a native Norwegian, I think, are extremely high. And it is a classic terrorist effort. And it’s gonna have a dramatic impact on Norway. There have been speculations because the famous Mohammed cartoons were published there, because of this cleric who’s under deportation proceedings. So without anyone taking responsibility for it or any definitive evidence, we can’t say for sure, but it sure looks like Islamic terrorism. [Fox News, America Live, 7/22/11]

After Acknowledging Lack Of Evidence, WSJ Still Speculated That Attack Was “The Work Of Islamists.” From a July 23 editorial:

Norway is not, in fact, a neutral country. Though it isn’t a member of the European Union, it is a founding member of NATO. Al Qaeda’s Ayman al-Zawahiri has repeatedly singled out Norway in his videotaped messages for “[participating] in the war against the Muslims.” Theories abound about the specific nature of Oslo’s “crime”: the 400 troops it currently deploys to Afghanistan; its house arrest of Mullah Krekar, a founder of the Kurdish terrorist group Ansar al-Islam; the republication of the Danish cartoons in a small Norwegian paper.

Perhaps all this is at work. Or perhaps not: At our first deadline reports indicated that the attacks were the work of a jihadist group. Later in the evening evidence emerged that a suspect in the shooting attack on a youth camp was an ethnic Norwegian with no previously known ties to Islamist groups. Coordinated terrorist attacks are an al Qaeda signature. But copycats with different agendas are surely capable of duplicating its methods.

Whatever the case, the attacks demonstrate that Norway is no more immune than any other country to such atrocities, no matter what its foreign or domestic policies may be. If this does prove to be the work of Islamists, it will be noted that neither Norway’s opposition to the war in Iraq nor its considerable financial and political support for the Palestinians spared it from attack. [The Wall Street Journal, 7/23/11]

3) “Breivik is not a Christian. It’s impossible. No one believing in Jesus commits mass murder.”

The utter hypocrisy glazed on this statement is too good not to explain. 

Here, Bill is making the completely false claim that Breivik is not a Christian. It is not for Bill to know whether a person is a Christian or not.

One of the key tenets of knowing a person is a Christian is hearing the person say, “I’m a Christian.” Breivik not only did that, but heavily used Christian paraphernalia to get his points across.

Also, Bill, Christians who believe in Jesus HAVE committed mass murder.

Take a look at this, Bill, and glisten some learning in your stubborn head. 

The mid 7^th century to the mid 10^th century CE saw the gradual expansion of Islam. Half of the Christian world was conquered by Arab armies; this included countries in which Christianity had been established for centuries, such as Egypt, southern France, southern Italy, Sicily, Spain, Syria, Turkey, etc. ₄

By the late 10^th century, Europe and the Middle East were divided into Christian and Muslim spheres of influence. Christian pilgrims from Europe regularly visited Muslim-controlled Jerusalem in reasonable safety. Such pilgrimages were very popular. The were believed to be one of the major acts by which a person could reduce their exposure to the tortures of purgatory after their death.

By the middle of the 11th century, Christianity had formally split between the Roman Catholic Church and the Byzantine Empire: The Emperor/Bishop of Constantinople and the Bishop of Rome had mutually excommunicated each other. In 1071, the Turks defeated the latter at the Battle of Manzikert. This left Constantinople exposed to attack from Muslims. Meanwhile, Christians were being ambushed during their pilgrimages to Jerusalem.

Emperor Alexius asked Pope Urban II for assistance. On 1095-NOV-27, the Pope called on Europeans to go on a crusade to liberate Jerusalem from its Muslim rulers. “The first and second wave of Crusaders murdered, raped and plundered their way up the Rhine and down the Danube as they headed for Jerusalem.“ ₁  The “army” was primarily composed of untrained peasants with their families, with a core of trained soldiers. On the way to the Middle East, they decided that only one of their goals was to wrest control of Jerusalem from the Muslims. A secondary task was to rid the world of as many non-Christians as possible - both Muslims and Jews. The Crusaders gave the Jews two choices in their slogan: “Christ-killers, embrace the Cross or die!” 12,000 Jews in the Rhine Valley alone were killed as the first Crusade passed through. Some Jewish writers refer to these events as the “first holocaust.”  Once the army reached Jerusalem and broke through the city walls, they slaughtered all the inhabitants that they could find (men, women, children, newborns). After locating about 6,000 Jews holed up in the synagogue, they set the building on fire; the Jews were burned alive. The Crusaders found that about 30,000 Muslims had fled to the al Aqsa Mosque. The Muslim were also slaughtered without mercy. 

The Roman Catholic church taught that going to war against the “Infidels” was an act of Christian penance. If a believer was killed during a crusade, he would bypass purgatory, and be taken directly to heaven. By eliminating what might be many millennia of torture in Purgatory, many Christians were strongly motivated to volunteer for the crusades. “After pronouncing a solemn vow, each warrior received a cross from the hands of the pope or his legates, and was thenceforth considered a soldier of the Church.” ₃

These mass killings were repeated during each of the 8 additional crusades until the final, 9^th, crusade in 1272 CE. Both Christians and Muslims believed that they were fighting on God’s side against Satan; they believed that if they died on the battlefield they would be given preferential treatment in the Christian Heaven or the Muslim Paradise. Battles were fought with a terrible fierceness and a massive loss of life. Over a 200 year period, perhaps 200,000 people were killed. The Muslim warrior Salah a-Din subsequently recaptured Jerusalem from the Christians.

By the end of the crusades, most European Christians believed the unfounded blood-libel myths — the rumor that Jews engaged in human sacrifice of Christian children. A long series of Christian persecutions of the Jews continued in Europe and Russia into the 20th century. They laid the foundation for the Nazi Holocaust. 

The result of centuries of conflict among followers of the three main Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) was a “deep mutual hatred” and mistrust among the three faiths. Memories of these genocides still influence relationships among Jews, Christians and Muslims to the present time.

Among many Jews and Muslims, the term crusade evokes visions of genocide, mass murder, and mass extermination of innocent people. However, among many Christians it has become a positive term, frequently used to refer to mass rallies and campaigns to win converts - as in the Billy Graham Crusades. Out of respect for the victims of the “first holocaust,” we recommend that the term be only used to refer to the wars of the Middle Ages.

Bill, Timothy McVeigh was a confessed and practicing Christian.

McVeigh was a registered Republican when he lived in Buffalo, New York in the 1980s, and had a membership in the National Rifle Association while in the military.^[84]

McVeigh was raised Roman Catholic.^[85] During his childhood, he and his father attended Mass regularly.^[86] McVeigh was confirmed at the Good Shepherd Church in Pendleton, New York, in 1985.^[87] In a March, 1996, interview with Time magazine, McVeigh professed his belief in “a God”, although he said he had “sort of lost touch with” Catholicism and “I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs.”^[85]In the 2001 book American Terrorist, McVeigh stated that he did not believe in Hell and that science is his religion.^[88][89] In June, 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo Newsclaiming to be an agnostic.^[90] Before his execution, McVeigh took the Catholic sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick.^[91]

Timothy’s acts were acts of terrorism, the largest act of terrorism, in the United States until 9/11.

Timothy was a terrorist, and him being a Christian makes him a CHRISTIAN TERRORIST. It’s not impossible, Bill.

You forget that God sent his son to die for the sins of the world, which even includes McVeigh, Breivik, and other terrorists of all faiths.

Take a look at history, Bill! You might learn something!