Lesbian Teen Kaitlyn Hunt Arrested Monday Night After Violating Terms of Plea Deal By Contacting Underage Partner Involved In Case…She Should Have Never Been Charged, Seeing As The Relationship Was Consensual!
A Florida teenager accused of having sex with an underage classmate turned herself into jail Monday.
Kaitlyn Hunt was booked into the Indian River County Jail Monday, almost a week after her 19th birthday.
Prosecutors withdrew a plea deal that would have spared Hunt any jail time and the requirement to register as a sex offender earlier Monday.
Prosecutors say Hunt violated her pre-trial release by contacting her girlfriend.
UPDATE 1: Here’s more info about the latest developments from Buzzfeed.
Kaitlyn Hunt, 19, was booked into Indian River County Jail in Florida on Monday night, charged with two felony counts of lewd and lascivious battery for having sex with a 14-year-old girl when she was 18.
The case has made headlines because Hunt’s family has suggested that the younger girl’s parents only brought the matter to police because Hunt, who went to the same high school as the girl, was gay.
Although Hunt’s family and lawyers have maintained that the relationship was consensual, Florida law states that no one younger than 16 can consent to sex.
As recently as last week, a new plea deal was under discussion, according to CNN.
The prosecutor, Bruce Colton, told CNN that, under the plea’s terms, Hunt would have pleaded guilty “to two misdemeanor battery counts and one felony count for interference of child custody — a charge that could be expunged later from her record.”
But, according to the booking record provided by the Indian River County Sheriff’s Office, Hunt was to have been arraigned on the two felony charges Monday morning. Hunt turned herself in at 9 p.m. Monday, with a bond set at $5,000. The news was first reported by Micah Grimes.
In May, University of Florida law professor Darren Hutchinson wrote about the complexity of the issues raised by the case — and the prosecutor’s pursuit of the case.
“Colton portrays the matter in very simplistic terms: the defendant violated the statute; actual consent is irrelevant; that they attend the same high school does not matter. But this reductionist position overlooks the important issues of sexuality, sexual orientation and fairness that this case implicates,” Hutchinson wrote.
UPDATE 2: Here’s University of Florida law professor Darren Hutchinson’s commentary on the case referenced in the preceding update.
The Kaitlyn Hunt case demonstrates, once again, the tendency of people to reduce complex problems into singular concerns. Hunt, an 18-year-old Florida high school student, was recently charged with felony sexual battery for having sex with a 14-year-old teen who attends the same school.
Two competing narratives regarding the case have developed in media accounts. A liberal narrative depicts the decision to prosecute Hunt as an act of homophobia. A conservative side has recently emerged which contends that the case has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Instead, the case concerns the regulation of sexuality; Hunt is being prosecuted simply because she violated a gender-neutral Florida statute. This “either/or” analysis, however, obscures the many factors that influence cases like this.
Regulation of Sexual Conduct Among Youths
Although much of the media discussion of the Hunt cases focuses on questions of homophobia and sexual orientation, this case, at a minimum, is indisputably about sexuality. Florida does not allow persons to consent legally to sexual conduct until he or she reaches the age of 18. The law does not contain any gender or sex classifications. Thus, it applies to heterosexuals, gays, lesbians and bisexuals. Accordingly, it is easy to identify sexuality as a factor in Hunt’s prosecution.
Sexual conduct among youths is a delicate topic. Many people believe that young persons — especially girls — lack the maturity to consent to sexual conduct. In fact, statutory rape laws in many states used to protect female “victims” exclusively. In these states, young males who had sex were effectively viewed as consenting individuals from the standpoint of the law. In 1980, the Supreme Court upheld a California statute of this kind. Those statutes have largely been repealed, and the modern trend criminalizes sexual conduct with minors regardless of gender.
Rigid application of statutory rape laws have received a tremendous amount of criticism. Historically, critics rightfully argued that statutory rape laws failed to recognize that teenagers commonly have sex with one another and that this conduct is not nearly as problematic as sex between adults and children. Thus, while states can legitimately ban sexual conduct between adults and children, when the two participants are very close in age, these laws can lead to questionable or unfair results.
In response to these arguments, many states have implemented “Romeo and Juliet” exclusions (which is literally heterosexist terminology) to reduce the harshness of statutory rape laws. In many states, consensual sexual conduct among individuals who are close in age, e.g., four years apart, is not considered rape or sexual assault. This is a departure from traditional practice. Florida, however, does not have such an exception. Instead, the state simply allows persons convicted in close-in-age situations to petition a judge to remove the “sex offender” registration requirement, which, if not done, would haunt the young defendant for his or her entire life.
The Hunt case implicates the historical critiques regarding the regulation of sexual conduct among youth. Hunt and her “victim” are both teenagers at the same school. According to media accounts, Hunt said that she loved the victim during a telephone conversation that police recorded. The victim’s parents said that their daughter ran away from home to be with Hunt after they demanded that the relationship end. That the victim went to Hunt’s house after her parents expressed their displeasure with her relationship with Hunt demonstrates the intimacy of the girls’ relationship. In real (even if not legal) terms, the relationship between the two girls was consensual.
In many states, the law would not criminalize this conduct. Florida is not one of those states. The condemnation of Hunt’s prosecution reveals that a large part of the public is uncomfortable treating sexual conduct among teenagers as criminal conduct — certainly as a serious felony. The decision to prosecute Hunt does not take into account the reality of teen sexuality and the harsh collateral consequences that result from labeling teenagers as felons and sex offenders. At least one Florida lawmaker agrees. State Senator Thad Altman (Republican) believes the state should decriminalize consensual sexual conduct among teenagers. Amending the statutory rape law, however, would likely face stiff resistance from conservatives.
Conservatives have recently sought to rebut the argument that sexual orientation is relevant in Hunt’s case. The face of the statute does not implicate sexual orientation because it applies to all sexual conduct regardless of the participants’ gender. Nevertheless, this does not preclude the possibility that homophobia shaped the decision to prosecute Hunt.
Criminal statutes do not mandate prosecution. Instead, prosecutors have the discretion to bring charges (see below). In many instances, punishable acts of sexual conduct among teenagers are never reported or pursued as criminal cases because either the parents or the participants do not want a criminal case.
Some parents approve of or acquiesce to the reality of teen sexual conduct. Some victims have effectively blocked prosecutions by refusing to testify. Prosecutors can choose to forego charges in cases of uncooperative victims or parents. They can also exercise their independent judgment and decide not to prosecute.
Consequently, when these cases proceed, they often do so based on the parents’ wishes. In other words, even if a person has committed statutory rape, the parents (and victims) can influence the decision whether to prosecute. For this reason and due to the prosecutor’s general discretion, homophobia could have led to the decision to prosecute Hunt, regardless of the neutrality of the Florida statute.
Many commentators claim that the victim’s parents are homophobic. They have denied this assertion. Although it is difficult to read the minds of the victim’s parents or the prosecutor, it is not unreasonable to argue that homophobia influenced this case. First, juvenile sex prosecutions have always raised questions of discrimination. For instance, several “black male defendant” and “white female victim” close-in-age prosecutions have generated intense public scrutiny.
In 2003, Georgia prosecuted Marcus Dixon, 18, for having sex with a 16-year-old white teenager who attended high school with him. Dixon, a black male, was a model student with a 3.96 GPA and a scholarship to Vanderbilt University. The state charged Dixon with numerous crimes, including forcible rape, statutory rape, aggravated child molestation, assault, and false imprisonment. Dixon was convicted of aggravated child molestation and statutory rape. He received a mandatory 10-year-sentence for aggravated child molestation.
Under Georgia law, statutory rape charge is a misdemeanor when the participants are close in age. But the prosecutor added on the aggravated child molestation charge, which carried a much harsher mandatory sentence. Critics argued that the prosecutor and the victim’s parents were motivated by race. Ultimately, the state supreme court dismissed the aggravated child molestation charge as inappropriately filed; today, Dixon is a professional football player.
In the past, Georgia law explicitly banned sexual conduct between blacks and whites. Today, it does not. But old habits die hard. If race can influence prosecutorial decisions in these cases, it is reasonable to believe that sexual orientation can do so as well.
And Florida is hardly progressive with respect to sexual orientation. In 2008, Florida voters amended the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage. The measure passed with the support of 62% of voters. Thus, on the question of marriage equality, the state constitution explicitly mandates antigay discrimination.
In 1977, Florida banned adoption by gay or lesbian persons. The state vigorously defended this law in state and federal court less than a decade ago. In 2008, a state appeals court invalidated the statute. After this ruling, the state relented and refused to enforce the statute or pursue further judicial review.
Florida does not have any statewide law that prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. And while recent polls demonstrate wide voter support for such a law, for the last six years, conservatives have declined to give this such a proposal a hearing or workshop in the legislature.
Given this recent history, the notion that a Florida public official or a family could push for prosecution of an alleged crime due to homophobic intent is not far-fetched. While it is unclear what has actually motivated the parents or the prosecutor, it is not unreasonable to consider homophobia as a possible factor. Even Bruce Colton, the prosecutor on the case, has conceded the opposition to homosexuality could have motivated the victim’s parents. Colton, however, denies that he is acting upon the victim’s parent’s desires, which seems implausible.
As stated above, prosecutors have the discretion to bring charges against a person who has allegedly engaged in criminal conduct. Statutes do not mandate prosecution, and the Supreme Court has treated prosecutorial discretion as an extremely important authority of states and the federal government.
Despite having the power to decline to bring criminal charges, Florida has decided to prosecute Hunt for felony sexual battery. Given the closeness in age of the victims and the possible homophobic motivation of the victim’s parents, many people have contested the prosecution. Colton portrays the matter in very simplistic terms: the defendant violated the statute; actual consent is irrelevant; that they attend the same high school does not matter. But this reductionist position overlooks the important issues of sexuality, sexual orientation and fairness that this case implicates.
There are at least three important issues raised by the prosecution of Kaitlyn Hunt. These issues include the regulation of sexual conduct among youths, sexual orientation, and prosecutorial discretion. Hopefully public debate regarding the prosecution of Hunt will become more comprehensive as the case progresses.
100 Notes/ Hide
- xxchromosom reblogged this from fundstelle
- fundstelle reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- zsadistcortel reblogged this from casey-lawrence
- casey-lawrence reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- k-mikeey likes this
- livingalonewithonlymythoughts reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- livingalonewithonlymythoughts likes this
- mspoeticluv likes this
- glassesandkaleidoscopes likes this
- stuffedbox likes this
- queer-as reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- nancyv26 likes this
- theperfectroadd reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- futanarisunshine likes this
- mtherulerman reblogged this from stsstuff
- mtherulerman likes this
- stsstuff reblogged this from stfueverything and added:
- let-there-be-rainbows reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- pecknstewart likes this
- ilovechelsearenae likes this
- pale-yurei likes this
- hatssherlockhappiness likes this
- chat-with-quill reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow and added:
- infinity-abbie likes this
- kabauble likes this
- concentrated-nonsense likes this
- the--enchanted--hunters likes this
- captain-melimel likes this
- mysocalled-gay-life reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- euraldius reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- tallblueme reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- coltonjellyfish reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
- muffinw reblogged this from stfueverything
- lesbionic-guide-to-the-galaxy likes this
- folikon likes this
- let-there-be-rainbows likes this
- electronickasaur likes this
- myrtleeesnow likes this
- siegfriedandfreud reblogged this from stfueverything
- teganjai reblogged this from feurety
- taedaddyissues likes this
- humanrightswatch likes this
- taxideinae likes this
- feurety reblogged this from generalbriefing and added:
- figmentsandfactualities reblogged this from stfueverything and added:
- cinnabana likes this
- amatsuki likes this
- generalbriefing reblogged this from stfueverything
- karateandcameras reblogged this from becauseforoncethisisme
- north-american-jingle-balls reblogged this from stfueverything