Obama Suggests A Constitutional Amendment To Overturn Citizens United
Oh really? Now that’s a campaign promise to which I hope we may hold him!
From addictinginfo.org:
When Citizens United was originally passed striking down federal limits on campaign spending by corporations and unions, it effectively ended elections of the people, by the people and for the people and ceded control to corporations. As per Justice Kennedy, “independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption and the appearance of influence or access will not cause the electorate to lose faith in this democracy.”
Bullshit.
Today on reddit Obama suggested a constitutional amendment to Citizens United might be the answer to stop the unprincipled, unethical, and contaminating influence of super pacs and dirty money.
Hi, I’m Barack Obama, President of the United States. Ask me anything. I’ll be taking your questions for half an hour starting at about 4:30 ET.
Question:
What are you going to do to end the corrupting influence of money in politics during your second term?
Answer:
Money has always been a factor in politics, but we are seeing something new in the no-holds barred flow of seven and eight figure checks, most undisclosed, into super-PACs; they fundamentally threaten to overwhelm the political process over the long run and drown out the voices of ordinary citizens. We need to start with passing the Disclose Act that is already written and been sponsored in Congress – to at least force disclosure of who is giving to who. We should also pass legislation prohibiting the bundling of campaign contributions from lobbyists. Over the longer term, I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United (assuming the Supreme Court doesn’t revisit it). Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super-PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change.
Per the Huffington Post:
Reddit moderators and administrators quickly confirmed it was actually Obama in the comment thread, and Obama himself posted on his verified campaign Twitter account that it was indeed him.
To view the entire tweet.
Well, by gosh I hope he does if he gets reelected. But this is not something he can executive order through Congress. Remember how the Constitution works guys? I’m behind that initiative though, absolutely.
Source: america-wakiewakie
24 Notes/ Hide
-
dirkashlyknoedler likes this
-
localcreature reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
-
poofyphluff reblogged this from jolly-dolly
-
jolly-dolly reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow and added:
I may not like a lot of the things he’s done (drones, domestic security) but I’d vote in Bugs Bunny and Elmer J. Fudd if...
-
letinout likes this
-
sarahlee310 likes this
-
hcshannon likes this
-
steenuh likes this
-
rebelatnight reblogged this from thepoliticalfreakshow
-
listeningstill likes this
-
eyesdriftskyward likes this
-
coatlicuesserpentskirt likes this
-
joshuaduane said:
He also can’t win another term after this year, so what’s it matter? As long as he gets his this time around. Are we even really thinking about 2016? The world is so fucked.
-
gnarlybynature likes this
-
the-uncensored-she likes this
-
goodcleanchristianfun likes this
-
flirtingwithfoolishness likes this
-
america-wakiewakie posted this


